Bastards Of Erebus: Pathfinder Adventure Path Council of Thieves #1 / Paizo 2009

Description

The Bastards Of Erebus: Pathfinder Adventure Path Council of Thieves #1
The Rebellion Begins
The Bastards of Erebus, an adventure by Sean K Reynolds with support articles by Mike Ferguson, Steven Schend, Amber Scott, and F. Wesley Schneider and fiction by Dave Gross, is the first chapter in the Council of Thieves adventure path and was released on August 19, 2009. It is the first Pathfinder Adventure Path volume to use the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game rules set.
The city of Westcrown is dying. Since being stripped of its station as the capital of Cheliax, the wealth and prestige of the city has gradually slipped away, leaving the desperate people to fend for themselves in a city beset by criminals, a corrupt nobility, and a shadowy curse. Can the PCs fight back against champions of both the law and the criminal world?
This volume of Pathfinder Adventure Path launches the Council of Thieves Adventure Path, and includes:
"The Bastards of Erebus," a Pathfinder RPG adventure for 1st-level characters, by Sean K Reynolds.
A gazetteer of Westcrown, the shadow-haunted City of Twilight, by Steven Schend.
An investigation into the lives of tieflings, along with hundreds of fiendish variations, by Amber Scott.
A deadly mystery of nobility and intrigue for Pathfinder Varian Jeggare and his tiefling bodyguard Radovan in a new series of the Pathfinder's Jounal, by Dave Gross.
Six terrifying new monsters by Mike Ferguson, Sean K Reynolds, and F. Wesley Schneider.
***** CONDITION *****
This copy is very good with cover wear & light corner bumping - interior unmarked and very fine
******THE FINE PRINT******
Shipping in the USA for .90 by USPS Priority
Combined shipping is available, first auction's full price and each additional is half off
On Aug-27-21 at 07:05:12 PDT, seller added the following information:
This is not "Extra Fine" as stated in the title description! It's not even "Fine" but "Very Good" as stated in the item description! The confusion is entirely due to my error for which I apologize. It's "Very Good" with all the various defects that implies